Defining Holiness
Ho´ly
a. | 1. | Set apart to the service or worship of God; hallowed; sacred; reserved from profane or common use; holy vessels; a holy priesthood. |
2. | Spiritually whole or sound; of unimpaired innocence and virtue; free from sinful affections; pure in heart; godly; pious; irreproachable; guiltless; acceptable to God. |
Ho´li`ness
n. | 1. | The state or quality of being holy; perfect moral integrity or purity; freedom from sin; sanctity; innocence. |
2. | The state of being hallowed, or consecrated to God or to his worship; sacredness. |
The above definitions are from Webster's online dictionary, and on top of that, in the NIV Bible there are 532 verses that have the words holy and holiness in them. I would say that the concept of holiness is pretty important in our journeys, especially as Christians. Sadly, I think certain interpretations of holiness often lead Christians to a way of living that can limit our availability/accessibility to others.
The most dangerous way in which we define holiness, or being holy, is when we interpret it as the freedom or absence of sin, especially in reference to the lives we live on this earth. If you believe as I do (and as what was covered in my last post on sin) that we live in continual sin and need to be continually in repentance, then it is impossible to see yourself as without sin or in in a state of having no sin. When we look at ourselves as being holy, we can cause permanent damage in our future relationships with others. Perhaps of more concern, when we see ourselves as holy beings we often give ourselves power and control over realities in which we have little knowledge and absolutely no control over. Instead of letting go and letting God work within us, we try to force (most often unintentionally) God into others. The results of this kind of approach have been catastrophic in my experience. With that said, it might be a good idea to look at other ways to view holiness.
The last thing I want anyone to do after reading the first couple paragraphs is to lose hope or to wonder, "why bother." The mistake is not an intentional one in how we apply holiness, and I believe it can be somewhat remedied if we plug a little humility into the concept. There are two definitions that I like from Webster's:
Holy- set apart to the service or worship of God
Holiness- the state of being hallowed, or consecrated to God or to his worship
If we set a standard for ourselves of being without sin, we will fail every time. It is not a matter of what people find out or how good we are at hiding it, even if no one (including ourselves) knows, we can never live up to this standard. It is akin to listing sins in that we focus too often on not sinning, and in doing so, we either don't live up to the list we've made, or worse, we commit sins that aren't on the list which we may not consider to be important or that we are ignorant to.
The beautiful thing about the definitions above is that it opens up a whole new way to look at scripture and holiness. The point is that we don't need to be sinless to be set apart in service or worship to God! In fact, I believe he prefers it if we come as we are and don't try to pretend that we are better than anyone else. This way of looking at holiness also brings scripture to our level, as intended by the writers of the gospels and Paul. Maybe Jesus didn't die to free us from our sins in this life, but instead died so we could have a more intimate and personal relationship with God and with others. Another way to phrase this is to recognize that Jesus died so the sins we continually commit won't be the death of us, but rather his death made the process of confession simpler through means of a more intimate relationship with God. (Feel free to ask questions in the comments or through email/facebook if you have trouble grasping what I'm trying to say or if you want to explore the topic further.)
Application
To me this is the most exciting opportunity in writing on sin and holiness. Imagine what we can do when we stop trying to be God, and instead take an honest approach to imitating the example of Christ. It's amazing what God can open us up to when we stop worrying about what other people are doing and why we should set ourselves apart from them. It's incredible what can happen when the church stops trying to be perfect and infallible, and this isn't just limited to Catholics. Churches have been their own worst enemies because of this approach.
Jesus didn't come to save the religious institution which was hell bent on dictating others' lives. He ate with "sinners" and healed these on the margins of society, people who had been been viewed as "unclean" or "unworthy" to be in relationship with him. And yet today it is ironic how often we see churches doing their best to dictate others lives as well as being intentional in steering clear of ministry to specific groups of people.
We are more concerned with not becoming like sinners that we cut ourselves off from being in communion and fellowship with the very people we're called to.
You might honestly ask yourselves who Christians are called to. It might be better if we ask ourselves: Who didn't Jesus die for? Make a list of all the people you feel are unworthy of Christ's love and I would argue those are the people you should be most worried about serving/being in fellowship with. There is NO ONE ALIVE who is not invited by Christ to be in relationship with God. It is a tragedy that we don't often take that approach, and even as I write this, I have failed many times at reflecting this outlook myself.
In conclusion, let us recognize that we are all sinners. We need each other and we need God. In following the example of Christ we will make many mistakes as we try to reach out to people who have been ignored for too long. Let's stop trying to maintain an impossible state, but instead let's strive to continually be transformed and to never be satisfied with where we are. I would rather miss the mark trying to follow Christ's example than I would trying to live a perfect life.
I hope this was helpful and thought provoking to those who have read my two part blog series. Feel free to leave impressions in the comments.
God bless,
Jason
6 comments:
Jason - you have developed your thought well. For further exploration of the human condition, I'd encourage reading Matthew Fox's book, "Original Blessing". Keep on bloggin' ...
Bill J.
I like the thoughts. Well reasoned and thought out. There's one part I'm interested in discussing:
"If we set a standard for ourselves of being without sin, we will fail every time."
I agree with you that if we set the standard of sinlessness, it's hopeless. But with God's help, do you think it's possible for us to live a sinless life this side of heaven?
Maybe my reading of 1st John is off, but it seems to me that John not only thinks so, but demands so.
Andy (http://andyszymas.blogspot.com)
@ Andy:
I do believe it is impossible to live a sinless life even with God's help, but I think the difference is how we interpret living a holy life or living without sin.
In the Old Testament, people had rituals and laws that they had to follow in order to atone for their sins. The relationship between people and God was very different, and for most people it was probably pretty distant. Once the price was paid or the ritual followed, the sins of the person performing the ritual was not held against him.
When Christ came and died, that relationship became more intimate and Christians today no longer follow rituals to atone for their sins. Our sins are not held against us because Christ made it possible to confess our sins directly with him.
So, I guess I somewhat agree that we can live a sinless life, but not because we aren't continually sinning, but through the process of confession we don't have our sins held against us.
Holiness is a tough concept because many things can be considered holy. I believe when we interact with God on a continual basis, we enter into a state of holiness, and that can be different things to different people.
I don't want to be misunderstood either, because I don't think we should take the "who cares" attitude and take Christ for granted. We should do our best with the struggles we know of and pray that God reveals to us the struggles we don't.
Hope that helps a little bit,
Jason
Jason, this is very well written and helpfully/successfully challenges abstract, idealistic notions of holiness; these are notions rooted more in neo-Platonic thought than in the biblical narratives.
I do think there are "tension points" in the biblical witness that indicate it is possible, in solidarity with other Christ-followers, to not only be considered "saints" but to live lives that are truly/actually "holy." Maybe that could be part three????
Jason-
I am a consistent reader of Andy Szymas' blog and was thrilled you invited him over for some guest posts.
I did read this post of yours and wanted to leave a couple verses behind that I find to be thought provoking. It at least opens up avenues for us to wrestle with tough ideas, ask tough questions with answers that don't come easy.
Colossians 1: "21Once you were alienated from God and were enemies in your minds because of[f] your evil behavior. 22But now he has reconciled you by Christ's physical body through death to present you holy in his sight, without blemish and free from accusation— 23if you continue in your faith, established and firm, not moved from the hope held out in the gospel. This is the gospel that you heard and that has been proclaimed to every creature under heaven, and of which I, Paul, have become a servant."
And,
Matthew 5: "48Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect."
Again, just some good verses to really think about.
Thanks for the insightful posting Jason!
Derek,
Thanks for the kind words. I don't necessarily know what point you are trying to make with those verses (if you were trying to make a point), but feel free to expand on your perspective/interpretation of scripture. I would only make matters worse (I fear) if I respond not knowing what you are getting at.
Post a Comment